Four Fundamental Forces – Electricity and Magnetism

Electromagnetism might be the best-known interaction to us. However, we mostly speak about two separate entities. First of them, electricity, is a force our entire modern society is based upon, since it propels possibly all modern devices, from the most primitive calculators to the fastest supercomputers. Without electricity, we would never have televisions, the internet, computers, and a lot more. There is no doubt that electricity is crucial for the proper functioning of today’s society. But what about the other of the two entities? Magnetism is mostly known for being an endearing force, due to which we can attach various objects to our fridges. But is electromagnetism really like that?

It turns out that electricity and magnetism are very closely related. So related, in fact, that one could not exist without the other. If you move an electrically charged particle (electron, for instance), a magnetic field is spontaneously formed around it. Conversely, anytime you move a magnet, an electric field is created. This phenomenon is exploited in power stations. Nearly all power stations are built on the principle of electromagnetic induction – a magnetic field is placed to the vicinity of an electrical conductor and spins perpetually (here, different types of power plants come into play – each type achieves the spinning of the magnetic field in a different way), which causes electric current to form in the conductor.

Just like gravity, electromagnetism has an infinite range. Unlike gravity, however, it does not affect every single object in the universe but only objects with electric charge (opposite charges attract each other, same charges repel). Nevertheless, electromagnetism can be observed all around us. Let us now describe individual manifestations of electromagnetism one by one. And we are going to start somewhat unexpectedly – with sight.

Sight is the most important of human senses. More than three quarters of all sensory perceptions our brain receives to process are provided by our eyes. Eyes that have been through hundreds of millions of years of evolution, so that they can function properly. All the various organs of sight, from the simplest of eyespots inside the bodies of minuscule organisms, to the most perfect eyes in the animal kingdom, have the same mission – to detect a specific part of the electromagnetic radiation which we like to call light.

As the name itself implies, electromagnetic radiation has something to do with electromagnetism. Its creation and propagation occur quite simply – a moving electric field generates a magnetic field, which in turn again generates an electric field, and so on. These repeating fields travel through space-time (at the speed of light, of course) until they reach an impediment that would absorb them.

For example, the electromagnetic radiation sent by the screen of the device on which you are reading these words travels into your eye, where it is absorbed and transformed into electric signals leading right to your brain. Once there, the signals are processed and consequently decoded as an image. If electricity and magnetism were not a conjoined entity, light would not be able to exist.

Now let us move to the subatomic level. Focus on any object in your field of vision. Positively charged protons attract the negatively charged electrons, which ensures the existence of the atoms your chosen object is made of. If we move a level up, we quite likely encounter molecules (collections of atoms) of the object. These molecules are formed due to diverse chemical bonds, which again are a manifestation of electromagnetism. In short, if this mesmerizing interaction ceased to exist, all objects around you – including yourself – would immediately break up into individual subatomic particles.

As we have just demonstrated, electromagnetism is, just like gravity, crucial for the existence of the cosmos as we know it. The manifestations of this interaction could be discussed much longer. However, we are going to move to the next, no less important force – the strong interaction.

Four Fundamental Forces – Gravity

Gravity differs from the other interactions in multiple ways. First of all, it is by far the weakest of fundamental forces. In fact, we can simply demonstrate this fact. Try to lift an object using your hand. A pencil, a glass, anything. If you have succeeded and the object is safely in the air surrounded by your palm, congratulations – you have just managed to overcome the gravitational pull of the entire Earth, whose mass is in trillions of trillions of kilograms. How can gravity be the dominant force of the universe when it is so immensely weak?

The reason is that the other three interactions, though much stronger, simply are not customized to become the prevailing force of the universe. Strong and weak forces have a very short range – they only affect objects that are far less than a billionth of a meter apart. And the last interaction, electromagnetism, only influences objects with an electric charge. The problem is that you do not find such objects very often in the macroworld – most objects are neutrally charged. So the only reason that this ridiculously frail interaction has become the motive force of the cosmos is that it simply has no competition.

The second factor that makes gravity special is that it is presumably not really a force, even though it has been viewed as such to the beginning of the 20th century. However, with the advent of Einstein’s theory of relativity, our view of gravity has changed radically. Einstein saw gravity merely as a curvature of space-time. Every object in the universe simply creates a kind of dimple in the space-time continuum and all other objects are inclined to move closer to that object.

It is like placing a heavy object into the middle of a trampoline – the entire surface of the trampoline curves downwards, and if you place a different object near its rim, it starts to roll towards the original object. This analogy, however, has an imperfection. Just like with the inflation of the universe after the Big Bang, we need to take away one dimension to comprehend the phenomenon.

The surface of a trampoline can be perceived as two-dimensional space (it has width and height, but no depth) similarly to a sheet of paper. An object placed to its middle causes its two-dimensional space to curve. Therefore, the surface of a trampoline with an object in its centre can be understood as a two-dimensional space curved in the third dimension.

However, our universe is three-dimensional, so any curvature caused by the presence of an object in our space-time occurs in the fourth dimension. That is also the reason why we can never perceive any gravitational curvature. We would need to be four-dimensional beings for the curvature to be revealed to us.

However, it does not hurt to know that nobody is sure whether this theory of gravitational space-time curvature is true. With today’s technical advancement, we are struggling to find evidence that gravity indeed curves our three-dimensional space.

But there is another view of gravity, completely different from the one I have just described. According to this view, gravity is provided by a hypothetical particle called the graviton. How? Simply said, every two objects in the universe exchange various numbers of gravitons, which causes them to attract.

To understand why there are two different perceptions of gravity today, we first need to become acquainted with the greatest problem of today’s physics – the everlasting search for the theory of everything. To achieve that, we need to travel more than a hundred years to the past, to the beginning of the 20th century, where we will witness the birth of the two greatest physical theories of today.

By the end of the 19th century, some physicists presumed that physics was already complete. They thought that everything had already been described by the old physical theories. But then came the year 1900, along with a new revolutionary theory called quantum mechanics, which proved how immensely wrong those physicists were. This theory describes the behaviour of objects from the microworld, which is completely different form the behaviour of “normal” objects. Fifteen years later, classical physics was stabbed again by Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which utterly transformed our view of gravity and beautifully described the motion of objects at high velocities.

However, there is a tremendous problem with these two theories – each one seems to describe a completely different world. While quantum mechanics successfully uncovers the peculiarities of the microworld, general relativity brilliantly describes the motion of objects of the macroworld. But if we wish to fully comprehend our mysterious universe, we need to unify these two incompatible theories into one. Physicists have been trying to achieve that for the past hundred years, so far without much success.

And the problem with today’s view of gravity rises from here. While the description of the remaining three interactions comes from quantum mechanics, the best understanding of gravity is provided by general relativity. Physicists therefore aim to describe gravity within the framework of quantum mechanics, so that it forms a single integrated theory. This non-existent theory is called the theory of quantum gravity or simply the theory of everything.

And that is the reason why there are two different views of gravity today – one almost perfect in the framework of general relativity, which is not compatible with other interactions, the other not so perfect within quantum mechanics, which is crucial for the upcoming theory of everything, but includes these peculiar particles called gravitons, which have never been detected.

Not to worry though – luckily, there are a few things that we know about gravity with certainty. Firstly, gravity is always attractive. There is no instance of two objects gravitationally repulsing each other. Secondly, gravity propagates with the speed of light, which is the highest velocity anything can reach when traveling through space-time. That means that if the Sun were to disappear now and stop influencing us gravitationally, it would take exactly 8 minutes and 20 seconds for us to notice it and free ourselves from the Sun’s gravitational field (at the same time, the Sun would also disappear from the sky, as the last of its light would reach our planet). Until then, the Earth would keep revolving around the non-existent Sun.

And the third fascinating thing we know about gravity is that its range is infinite. Your own body attracts all the other objects from the observable universe – though it may seem peculiar, you are gravitationally attracting your computer, every single person on this planet, or the Andromeda galaxy, located several million light years away. It goes without saying that the gravitational interaction between you and the objects around you is absolutely negligible – gravity is simply too weak and its power starts showing only with overwhelmingly huge objects.

Length of All Human DNA Combined

18,819,542 LIGHT YEARS

The Local Group is our pocket of the Universe, the limit we will never cross. But if we took the DNA of all the humans present on Earth in 2021, untangled and put these strands together into one long ribbon, it would span one and a half times across the Local Group. Bunched up tightly together, our species’ collective DNA could fill a cube with sides the length of a football field.

Fornax Cluster

33,700,000 LIGHT YEARS

Clusters are families of entire galaxies, that unlike real families aren’t bound together by blood, petty feuds and love, but gravity. They contain enough matter to pull even distant family members toward them — again, with gravity, not a bad conscience and wedding ceremonies like real families do. Hanging out 60 million light years away, you could call this cluster of galaxies the next neighborhood over from ours.

Fracking Explained: Opportunity or Danger

What is hydraulic fracturing – or fracking ?
Since the industrial revolution our energy consumption has risen unceasingly.
The majority of this energy consumption is supplied by fossil fuels like coal or natural gas.
Recently there has been a lot of talk about a controversial method of extracting natural gas: Hydraulic fracturing or fracking.
Put simply, fracking describes the recovery of natural gas from deep layers inside the earth.
In this method, porous rock is fractured by the use of water, sand and chemicals in order to release the enclosed natural gas.
The technique of fracking has been known since the 1940s.
Nonetheless, only in the last ten years has there been quite a “fracking boom”, especially in the USA.
This is because most conventional natural gas sources in America and on the European continent have been exhausted.
Thus prices for natural gas and other fuels are rising steadily.
Significantly more complicated and expensive methods, like fracking, have now become attractive and profitable.
In the meantime, fracking has already been used more than a million times in the USA alone.
Over 60% of all new oil and gas wells are drilled by using fracking.
Now let’s take a look at how fracking actually works.
First, a shaft is drilled several hundred meters into the earth.
From there, a horizontal hole is drilled into the gas-bearing layer of rock.
Next, the fracking fluid is pumped into the ground using high-performance pumps.
On average, the fluid consists of 8 million liters of water which amounts to about the daily consumption of 65,000 people.
Plus several thousand tons of sand and about 200,000 liters of chemicals.
The mixture penetrates into the rock layer and produces innumerable tiny cracks.
The sand prevents the cracks from closing again.
The chemicals perform various tasks among other things, they condense the water, kill off bacteria or dissolve minerals.
Next, the majority of the fracking fluid is pumped out again.
And now the natural gas can be recovered.
As soon as the gas source is exhausted, the drill hole is sealed.
As a rule, the fracking fluid is pumped back into deep underground layers and sealed in there.
However, fracking is also associated with several considerable risks.
The primary risk consists in the contamination of drinking water sources.
Fracking not only consumes large quantities of fresh water, but in addition the water is subsequently contaminated and is highly toxic.
The contamination is so severe that the water cannot even be cleaned in a treatment plant.
Even though the danger is known and theoretically could be managed, in the USA already sources have been contaminated due to negligence.
No one yet knows how the enclosed water will behave in the future, since there have not yet been any long-term studies on the subject.
The chemicals used in fracking vary from the hazardous to the extremely toxic and carcinogenic, such as benzol or formic acid.
The companies using fracking say nothing about the precise composition of the chemical mixture.
But it is known that there are about 700 different chemical agents which can be used in the process.
Another risk is the release of greenhouse gases.
The natural gas recovered by fracking consists largely of methane, a greenhouse gas which is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide.
Natural gas is less harmful than coal when burned.
But nonetheless, the negative effects of fracking on the climate balance are overall greater.
Firstly, the fracking process requires a very large consumption of energy.
Secondly, the drill holes are quickly exhausted and it is necessary to drill fracking holes much more frequently than for classical natural gas wells.
In addition, about 3% of the recovered gas is lost in the extraction and escapes into the atmosphere.
So how is fracking and its expected benefits to be assessed when the advantages are balanced against the disadvantages?
When properly employed, this technique offers one way in the short to medium term for meeting our demand for lower-cost energy.
But the long-term consequences of fracking are unforeseeable and the risk to our drinking water thus should not be underestimated.

Virgo Supercluster

144 MILLION LIGHT YEARS

If the observable Universe is our world, the Local Group of galaxies our neighborhood, and the Milky Way our house, the Virgo Supercluster is our city. The “city” has more than 700 galaxies in 100 Local Group “neighborhoods”, and stretches 110 million light years across. To put that in perspective, if the observable Universe is a sphere with a diameter of 1 km, large enough to contain the tallest skyscrapers, the Virgo Supercluster is a sphere 1.47 m across, about the height of a child. On that scale, the Milky Way is a tiny disk 2 mm across.

Distance to the Great Attractor

220 MILLION LIGHT YEARS

Space looks calm, but actually our own galaxy, the Milky Way, is traveling through the cosmos at 2.2 million km an hour. This is a bit of a mystery. According to our ideas about the Big Bang, everything in the Universe should be flying apart at similar speeds. If everything is moving at similar speeds, it should look like nothing is really moving at all. When some objects seem to be moving faster than others, it’s usually because clumps of matter like galaxy clusters are exerting an additional gravitational pull. But we know of nothing close to the Milky Way that explains its drift — we just know that something must be causing it. Astronomers named the mysterious clump of matter we haven’t found yet “The Great Attractor”.

Four Fundamental Forces – Introduction

The Big Bang theory can satisfyingly explain the creation of the cosmos, but it fails to explain the interaction among various types of energy in the universe. Why did shortly after the Big Bang some elementary particles join to make protons and neutrons? And what made electrons bind to them later to create atoms? Why did these atoms then go on to build glaring stars and vibrant galaxies?

It turns out that all events in the universe can be blamed on four fundamental interactions (four fundamental forces) – gravity, electromagnetism, strong interaction and weak interaction. I am sure everybody has at least a basic overview of the first two forces, the last two, however, might be entirely foreign to some. But it is crucial to understand these interactions, since they govern the whole universe.

Take your own body as an example. First, let us dive deep into the microworld, where we can see the basic building blocks of everything. Your body is, just like everything else in the universe, made up of energy. It is of course present in many various forms, but fundamentally, it is simply energy.

The energy of the human body is concentrated mainly in the form of elementary particles – the same particles that were created just a moment after the Big Bang. These particles then form composite particles – protons and neutrons. But what keeps elementary particles together? The answer lies in the strong interaction. If we jump one level up, we can see collections of protons and neutrons – atomic nuclei. Again, we can blame the strong interaction. Going another level up, we can see electrons, devoutly whizzing around the nuclei. Here, we observe the token of another fundamental force – electromagnetism. Individual atoms then go on to form molecules – electromagnetism shows itself once again.

And finally, unless you are currently at the international space station or reading this text in a distant future on a faraway planet (most likely on Mars, as explained in one of the following chapters), it is quite likely that you are finding yourself on our tiny blue planet. And the only “force” keeping your feet on the ground instead of flying off to space is gravity – another of the four forces.

Our demonstration is over now. We have seen the essence of three of the four interactions using only the human body on Earth. If you are interested in the fourth force as well, you will have to wait a while – it manifests itself the least of the four forces. But now, let us analyse the interactions in detail, one by one. And we will start with the most sneaky and peculiar one – gravity.

History of Our Cosmos – Atoms, Stars, and the Reign of Gravity

Once the first violent fraction of a second was over, the evolution of the universe slowed. A lot. The key expressions for the following development of the cosmos are cooling, expansion and the synthesis of simpler structures to create more complicated ones. About a millionth of a second after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe decreased to such an extent that the simplest particles started joining to create more complicated particles – the first protons and neutrons came into existence. A few minutes after, these particles started clumping together and the first atomic nuclei saw the light of day. This process is called the nuclear fusion.

The temperature of the cosmos was approximately one billion degrees Celsius back then – still a breath-taking value but ridiculously small compared to the prior values. Just 20 minutes after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe was no longer high enough to sustain nuclear fusion. The creation of new elements ceased for several million years – until the first stars initiated it again.

When the fusion stopped, three quarters of all matter in the universe formed hydrogen nuclei (the lightest element), the last quarter made up helium nuclei (the second lightest element). However, it took another 380,000 years before electrons bound to them, which flooded the cosmos with the first atoms.

380,000 years after the Big Bang, a new epoch of the universe began. Photons could finally move freely through space-time due to the creation of atoms. But what is more, a seemingly innocent force that was present almost from the very beginning slowly started to gain power – gravity. One of the following chapters is dedicated to this fascinating interaction, for now you only need to know one thing – every single object in the universe is attracted to every single other object, while the amplitude of the force with which they attract is proportional to the square of the distance between the two objects. What does it mean? Simply said, if two objects are one meter apart, the gravitational force between them is four times as great as if they were two meters apart.

The gravitational force, even though it is the weakest of the four fundamental interactions (again, you will have to wait for the following chapter), has become the unquestionable dominant force of the universe. Right after the Big Bang, tiny disproportions in the distribution of matter were produced due to vacuum quantum fluctuations. Imagine spilling a handful of sugar on a paper. It is hugely unlikely that each section of the paper would contain the same number of sugar grains. On the contrary – some spots would contain large clusters of sugar, whereas others would hold no sugar at all. And something similar happened to the early cosmos – some sections of space-time simply contained more energy than other sections.

In places with a higher concentration of energy, more elementary particles, more atomic nuclei and eventually more atoms were created. This was crucial for the following development of the cosmos. Were it not for the early fluctuations causing disproportions in energy density, each bit of the universe would contain an identical amount of matter and gravity would never be able to show itself.

It is as if you tried to move a cube but you would keep pushing all faces with exactly the same force – the cube would stay in place no matter how large the force would be. However, if you applied just a little more force to one of the faces, the cube would start moving in the direction of the force. To some extent, this is what happened in the 380,000 years old universe. The parts of the cosmos with a higher concentration of matter gravitationally affected each other more and began happily attracting – the first nebulae saw the light of day.

Then, these nebulae were becoming denser and denser due to gravity and the temperature in their cores was gradually increasing. After several hundred million years, the temperature in their hearts was so high that nuclear fusion was ignited – the first generation of stars was born. These stars then went on to clump together into enormous formations called galaxies, which exist to this day and often contain up to billions of astral residents.

All that time, however, stars were doing something immensely important – they transformed simpler elements like hydrogen and helium into more complicated ones. The universe beheld elements like carbon, oxygen and iron for the first time. But every star has to die eventually. The early stars were usually gigantic and ended their lives in massive explosions, during which they ejected an enormous amount of material into the surrounding space.

The material then went on to create the next generation of nebulae and the entire process repeated – the nebulae formed new stars which in turn built more and more complicated elements. These were once again expelled into the adjacent vacuum. However, some of the elements started forming new structures, which had never existed before, called planets – smaller cosmic objects in which nuclear fusion is not ignited. Planets usually revolve around a parent star. Such a star was essential for the early planets, since it supplied them with necessary energy, which allowed various chemical reactions to occur. These reactions then enabled the formation of the first amino acids. Then, after many years of effort, at least one of the planets created the most complicated known entity in the whole universe – life.

The Great Nothing

330 MILLION LIGHT YEARS

“The Great Nothing” is an enormous sphere in the Universe famous for containing a very sparse number of galaxies — space’s version of the Australian Outback.

No one knows for sure why the Great Nothing exists. The most fun (totally unfounded) hypothesis is that perhaps the void is created by an expanding Kardashev III scale civilization that has been around long enough to conquer a major region of the Universe and capture the energy of its galaxies.